≡Torrent≡ Watch Movie Incitement
▶ ✵✵✵✵✵✵✵✵✵✵✵
▶ ☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
Actors - Amitay Yaish Ben Ousilio, Yoav Levi. Ron Leshem, Yaron Zilberman. Israel. Directed by - Yaron Zilberman. Liked It - 248 Vote. Runtime - 123 minute. Terrible days quotes. 
Terrible day meme. Just come back from south India the waiters there all dislike the young Jews the way they behave to them.
Level 1 Free Fire pissed me off, but was a fun watch. level 1 The Mist. Fuck that movie. But, it gives me such a visceral reaction that I can't deny it's effective artwork. level 1 I watched the entirety of Water World despite the fact that its opening scene should be enough to scare someone away. (The main character literally drinks his own piss-turned-water) level 1 Any HP movie where I see Umbridges dumb ass face and hear her dumb ass voice level 1 Funny Games USA. It's streaming on Netflix US now. level 1 Unbreakable. So close to being great, but swerving away violently toward the middle.
Apparently when you treat MSM the same way they treat you they get offended Go Trump. 🇺🇸. Days gone terrible. Terrible day book. Terrible day in spanish. Terrible day percy jackson. This film is a re-creation of the life of Yigal Amir, the assassin of Yitzhak Rabin, from the time of the announcement of the 1st Oslo peace accord, to the actual deed. While Yigal was already a nationalist (he starts by being arrested at an anti-Oslo rally) various forces encouraged or abetted him towards assassination.
There is his mother, encouraging him to greatness, as per his name. There are rabbis who proclaim that Jewish law should supercede secular law, and also that Rabin is a "Persuer" and an "Informer" permitting him to be killed. There is a Likud / Bibi rally, where calls to kill Rabin go unchecked. There are girlfriends / potential brides, who just distance themselves from him but not report his thoughts to authorities. About the only person who comes off well is his father, who said that, if Rabin should be struck down, it should be by the hand of God and not of man.
I was at the world premiere (see: trivia) where the director said the film project was started 5 years ago, and it is just coincidental that it is coming out as populists hold hate-filled rallies.
Terrible day not a terrible life.
Terrible days off early on.
I seriously hope that this film and others like it begin to gain traction. At the expense of sounding preachy, to some degree I understand women. For the sake of argument, they have been the most marginalized group of people throughout all of human civilization. But back to my original point, powerful people with easy access to a tremendous amount of economic and other forms of persuasive resources who use it to exploit the vulnerabilities of many - in this case, purchasing, the services of young attractive women and then legally silencing them - needs to be exposed.
Ana is amazing.
There's some study that shows that women don't know how to be funny and mock reality. It ties to their nature in picking a mate, so for her to say that is not surprising. Girls can't like immaturity. I love this Woman. Favourite moment: Jojo grabs the grenade, jumps the trench and throws it. only for it to hit a tree and explode in front of him. the instructor simply says and don't do that. 9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Going through old issues of the Wrestling Observer Newsletter and posting highlights in my own words, continuing in the footsteps of /u/daprice82. For anyone interested, I highly recommend signing up for the actual site at f4wonline and checking out the full archives. FUTURE YEARS ARCHIVE: The Complete Observer Rewind Archive by /u/daprice82 1-5-1987 1-12-1987 1-18-1987 2-2-1987 2-9-1987 2-16-1987 2-23-1987 3-2-1987 3-9-1987 3-16-1987 3-23-1987 4-6-1987 4-13-1987 4-20-1987 4-27-1987 5-4-1987 5-11-1987 5-18-1987 5-25-1987 6-1-1987 6-8-1987 6-15-1987 6-22-1987 6-29-1987 7-6-1987 7-13-1987 7-20-1987 7-27-1987 8-3-1987 8-10-1987 8-17-1987 8-24-1987 8-31-1987 - - - ”If everyone in this business was like Paul Boesch, this would be the greatest business in the world. ” -- Jerry Brisco from the book Professional Wrestling (not published) by Ray Tennenbaum. That’s how Dave introduces this issue and begins his coverage of the Paul Boesch farewell show. The show had a sellout crowd of 10, 000 at Houston Coliseum, and WWF brought in dozens of notable wrestling figures to Houston to attend the show. Among the big names were Lou Thesz, Gene Kiniski, Verne Gagne, Jose Lothario, Ernie Lad, Tiger Conway Sr., Red Bastien, Billy “Red” Lyons, Jack Tunney, Sputnik Monrow, Bronko Lubich, Boris Malenko, Nick and Jerry Kozak, Cyclone Anaya, Mike Mazurski, Danny McShane, Stu Hart, Jesse James, Jim Casey, Ox Anderson, Pat Patterson, and more. Tiger Conway Sr, Cyclone Anaya, and Danny McShane in particular all got huge reactions for their appearances. The show had an appropriate dose of nostalgia that the crowd enjoyed as much as the matches, and the whole thing had the look and feel of a big event and therefore came across as the big event it was. Vice President George Bush sent a telegram to Boesch to congratulate him on his 55 year tenure in the wrestling industry. More on the show itself later in the issue. Dave’s been to a lot of WWF and JCP/NWA shows the past few weeks, and the promotions seem almost like night and day to him. They’re different enough that Dave thinks they probably aren’t really competing for the same audience in the way many people believe, but rather that they attract entirely different types of people. Their live shows have different atmosphere and production, and the things Dave likes and dislikes about each promotion are more obvious to him now than ever. In terms of matches, while WWF has some great wrestlers (Ted DiBiase for instance) and JCP has some lousy ones (Bugsy McGraw, for instance), by and large the more intense, less botchy, more competently executed matches on average belong to the wrestlers in JCP. Dave was surprised how many wrestlers, even though their pace was much slower than JCP’s standard, blew up after five minutes at the Boesch farewell show, which suggests that there’s a significant lag in cardio for WWF. Otherwise, WWF has numerous obvious advantages. The way they present shows, whether they’re a small spot show, a tv taping, or a big show like the Boesch farewell always comes across as major league. They have a better behaved, though “for the most part ignorant of the wrestling aspect” crowd. All of that combined with the more upbeat atmosphere makes them much more attractive to a person who is coming to watch wrestling for the first time. Dave went to three WWF shows this past week. One was a small spot show that had almost no bumps and nearly no high spots, but the crowd reacted because they were invested in personalities and it was even fun for Dave because of that until a disastrous Hart Foundation/Rougeaus match. He went to the Aug 24 tv tapings in San Francisco, and that was a bad show (Dave’s already gotten dozens of letters and phone calls about it) where the crowd of 14, 700 were drained by the third hour. Most of them had come for Hogan and had not realized three tv shows and an MTV video were being taped, so they felt used. The Boesch farewell, by contrast, came off well and the crowd enjoyed it quite a lot. Even though the matches were not great, what Dave did figure out is that since they were taping for tv in some capacity, the wrestlers worked hard. That said, it shows that even when they put in the work, the average WWF wrestler just isn’t of the same caliber in the ring as the competition. WWF’s tv production gets a whole big paragraph about what makes it great. Dave isn’t sure what they spend per taping, but wouldn’t be surprised if the figure exceeds $100, 000. The quality of the production means that from a casual fan perspective it’s simply leagues better than the competition because it has the glitz, the timing on entrances, interview insets and other distractions from bad matches, short matches that keep attention to the entrance, and overall production value to cover over the weaknesses. Between better presentation and better marketing, it’s no wonder WWF is number one by a large margin. The fact is quite simply, with some notable exceptions of markets that were hot for high-action wrestling), match quality does not bring fans back. What brings fans back is an upbeat atmosphere and WWF is great at having an upbeat atmosphere - it’s more important to have the faces stand tall than to have tons of great matches. Dave’s overall conclusion is that when you consider WWF and Crockett outside the areas where they have that initial territorial advantage (so outside Georgia, New England, the Mid-Atlantic states), Crockett has greater appeal than WWF to people like Dave and the readers of the Observer and one other group. That is, hardcore fans who want action and those who like a little more sleaze in their entertainment. Dave’s accepted blading and the resultant scarred foreheads as just part of the business (like knee injuries to football, elbow and shoulder issues to baseball, etc. ) after being around wrestling and a fan for so long, but to the general audience that sort of thing comes across as a bit sleazy. And with AIDS in the picture today, it seems very dangerous if the wrestling industry isn’t implementing AIDS testing. One of Dave’s friends who is a huge JCP fan and hates WWF even noted to him that between the constant swearing and flipping off of fans which is done by the faces even more than the heels (because the faces in JCP get sidetracked hard when the fans cheer for the heels over them), too much blading, Space Mountain, Dusty Rhodes, and the women’s match where it just built to Misty Blue ramming a flagpole up Mad Dog Debbie’s crotch it’s just not the sort of thing Dave or his friend would let their kids watch. And all those antics get a great reaction from the live show and there’s a big audience that loves that stuff, but it just reads as bad to the general public and keeps wrestling’s reputation in the dungheap. If both promotions were running a big show with equivalent lineups on the same day in San Francisco, Dave would pick the Crockett show because he wants good wrestling over good atmosphere, but he would be in the minority - WWF would draw a bigger crowd guaranteed. What has been keeping Crockett successful in the face of WWF’s advantages, Dave believes, is the better wrestling, not the sleaze. Dave does some plugs for other newsletters, and particularly commends Pro Wrestling Digest. He’s friends with the guys who put it together, and it’s mostly discussion/opinion on the current scene rather than news and results, but it’s really interesting reading and Dave says the most recent issue was more interesting than any other newsletter he’s seen including the Observer. Part of the credit for that goes to the fact that they’ve got five people putting their views in, whereas most newsletters only have the one. The Paul Boesch farewell show is in the books. We’re still before the era of having multiple ppv shows, so I’ve got to work a little to find times to say that about shows and keep the tradition alive. The opener was good for WWF as Sam Houston beat Steve Lombardi. It was a bit of a mismatch - Houston loves bumping wildly, but Lombardi’s offense doesn’t really allow for that. Bruno beat Hercules Hernandez, and Bruno’s still got a good flurry of punches, but unless you grew up in the northeast, he just seems like a slow old man to crowds. Andre the Giant came out and the crowd booed him, so he stormed to the back. He’s looking slimmer and in much better shape since his operation. Dave hears he’ll be back in action in about three months. Brutus Beefcake beat Johnny V in a hair match and they shaved Johnny V bald, which was the only part that got heat. Ted DiBiase brought a kid out to sing “Yellow Rose of Texas” after giving a promo insulting Houston’s economy, then refused to pay the kid the $300 he promised. Ted’s routine was the best part of the show. Tom Prichard beat Mark Lewin in a short match that was all action but didn’t invest the crowd. Hogan beat One Man Gang in his typical match, deafening reaction. Dave gives the match 3 stars which puts it at match of the show. Sherri Martel beat Moolah in a match where, believe it or not, Moolah actually looked real good even though, for some reason, she was playing babyface. They fucked up the finish and Moolah wound up just laying down and telling Sherri to cover her. JYD (and Dave reveals that his poll on whether to keep nicknames were 117-19 in favor of keeping him as Junkfood Dog) and Tony Atlas (managed by Ernie Ladd) beat Kamala and Sika in four minutes. JYD blew up over the 90 seconds he was in the match. Kamala tried to leap frog JYD, but JYD forgot to duck and Kamala nearly killed him as a result. Terry Funk beat Chavo Guerrero, and Funk even kicked out of Chavo’s swan dive from the top. They introduced all the retired wrestlers. Thesz and Kiniski were introduced as former world champions, but Gagne was not. Boesch gave a retirement speech. Ted DiBiase beat Jim Duggan and it was good, but more bad luck for Duggan. He hasn’t wrestled in three months and looked like he was around 310 lbs, and he blew up faster than expected. DiBiase helped him through, but then Duggan’s hamstring went out and DiBiase had to go to the finish. You could see Duggan’s pain clearly and it was the first time the crowd had ever seen Duggan pinned clean, so they were shocked. Tito Santana and Mil Mascaras (managed by Jose Lothario) beat Demolition by DQ. Great pace, but botchy because Mascaras doesn’t work well with others. Mr. Fuji tripped Satana and got Demolition disqualified, but they botched that too as the spot was supposed to be 90 seconds earlier when Santana did a stumble off the rope with no Fuji around him to have tripped him. UWF’s Night of Champions from August 29 in Houston is also in the books. Misty Blue beat Comrade Orga in a bad match that ultimately led to Misty (who was billed as defending the NWA World Women’s Title) crotching Mad Dog Debbie with a pole as mentioned above. Shane Douglas beat Pez Whatley with an inside cradle to retain the UWF TV Title. Ron Simmons beat the Enforcer with a flying tackle off the middle rope. Simmons lost his footing and more fell than flew into the tackle. Steve Cox beat Gary Young with an inside cradle to win the rookie of the year trophy. Lots of missed moves, mainly by Cox, but he’s also only been working for six months. Brad Armstrong and Tim Horner beat Black Bart and The Terminator (Mark Laurinaitis, brother of Johnny Ace and Road Warrior Animal) to retain the UWF Tag Titles. Horner dropkicked Terminator from the top rope all the way to the other side of the ring where Terminator was standing by the ropes. Terry Taylor beat Chris Adams. Taylor still gets lots of cheers from women in the crowd, and the match was all action and superb action at that. Four stars from Dave. Steve Williams retained the UWF Title against Big Bubba Rogers. Sting downed Eddie Gilbert in a Texas Death match. They both bled, Sting bleeding real bad. There was a ref bump, interference, and when the ref came to both men were down so the ref declared that whoever found their feet first was the winner. Dusty Rhodes beat Lex Luger (spelled Lugar on his robe) by DQ in a US Title match. They had Lex at 268 and Dusty at 265 which is just laughable. JJ Dillon interfered just before Luger would have lost to the sleeper. The Rock & Roll Express retained the NWA Tag Titles against Blanchard and Anderson in another excellent match. Ricky Morton was particularly impressive, doing all kinds of new moves he’s never done including a flying headscissors into a Mexican rollup. Four stars from Dave for this match too. Ric Flair pinned Barry Windham, and it was great but they recycled the finish from the same building in June when Flair beat Michael Hayes (the end of the sequence saw Flair and opponent collide, with Flair falling on top for the pin) which pissed a lot of fans off. Four stars from Dave for this one too, despite the finish looking stupid. Wrestlemania 4 will not be at the Silverdome due to a conflict with the NCAA. The regional playoffs will be there that same day, so where Wrestlemania will be is up in the air. Silverline Comics has inked an agreement with Big John Studd. They’ll be doing a full-color monthly adventure-wrestling series and a Big John Studd graphic novel in June. Studd will be portrayed as a 6’11” babyface wrestler who freelances as an undercover investigator. WWF finally did the Bam Bam debut thing with the surprise twist of rejecting Slick and bringing out Sir Oliver Humperdink as his manager on the August 25 Superstars tapings in Fresno. They did a grudge match later in the taping against Nikolai Volkoff (managed by Slick) where Bigelow squashed Volkoff. Watch: Bam Bam Bigelow debuts in WWF WWF taped lots of videos for MTV this week, including Koko B. Ware lip synching the song Piledriver at the Cow Palace and getting booed heavily during the taping. They’ll probably sweeten the crowd to get it to sound okay on tape. Most of the arena were booing, but about 200 fans right up front were bouncing like it was a rock concert. Not a lot know this, but Koko used to sing in a four-part black gospel band and he supposedly has a fairly good singing voice. Watch: Piledriver, the music video Dave runs down WWF’s San Francisco tv tapings from August 26. Rip Oliver debuted, but half the crowd was buying snacks. Match would have been okay with any heat. DiBiase wasn’t over at all here, but wrestling against Lanny Poffo didn’t help. Dave gives Killer Khan vs. Darrell Nickel -3 stars. Nickel couldn’t even walk. Seeing Ric Rude up close, Dave corrects himself that Rude’s physique does look better than Hercules’s does. He also thinks Rude will do better than he had expected in WWF, but doesn’t see him going beyond the level Hercules is at. [JCP/NWA] Paul Jones is bringing in a new wrestler next week. Dave believes it will be Steve Disalvo. Good on interviews, potential to be a decent name, but bad in ring. [JCP/NWA] Starrcade has officially been announced for Chicago on Thanksgiving, and will be available on national ppv. Remember that last bit as we get closer to November. Chicago was probably picked to make it look more major league to suits, but Dave thinks it would probably be more impressive to suits if they had a show that sold out with a $380, 000 live gate. The reason why there’s no more Crockett content on Pro Wrestling this Week is because Jim Crockett pulled the plug. Pro Wrestling this Week joined up with Dave McLane’s POWW and the AWA to make a joint advertising network like Vince’s WWF network and Crockett’s Wrestling network (that is, their syndicated packages). To Crockett, that was PWTW declaring direct competition against Crockett for advertising, so he’s pulled the tapes. Jim Barnett is now working for Crockett out of the Dallas office. [Florida] Kevin Sullivan now enters the ring on a motorcycle. What an American badass. [AWA] Larry Nelson’s heart attack was actually an ulcer attack. Similar symptoms to a heart attack. Anyway, he’s back now. [AWA] Madusa Miceli is managing Nick Kiniski and Kevin Kelly now. She’s still green at the ringside role, but she’s getting good heat. There’s talks of George Cannon helping AWA by promoting them out of Toronto with what’s left of the Montreal territory. That may be just talks at this point. It may be nothing. UWF will be debuting tv in New York on Saturdays at noon starting on September 19. Since it’s New York, they’re going to include all the big JCP guys (Road Warriors, Dusty, Horsemen, etc. ) in addition to the main UWF guys (Williams, Gilbert, Taylor, Windham, etc. ). They’re also going to have tv again on channel 36 in San Jose, in an 11 pm Saturday slot. New Japan’s latest tour opened with a crowd of 1840 at Korauken Hall on August 24. With Kimura needing knee surgery, Masa Saito’s green card problems, and Inoki pulling a muscle on August 20, they were all out for the show and they had to change the card. Riki Choshu/Akira Maeda/Osamu Kido beat Seiji Sakaguchi/Yoshiaki Fujiwara/Kantaro Hoshino in the main event, and FujinamiMurdoch went to a double countout. Mutoh and Keiichi Yamada beat Mark Rocco (former Black Tiger) and Owen Hart with Mutoh pinning Rocco (so Owen didn’t have to do the job on his first match in). I’ve kind of avoided bringing this in yet, because it’s only been lightly alluded to and never actually described in the Newsletter, but there’s been a trickle of letters and even the occasional comment by Dave about Ric Flair and Precious. For the Great American Bash tour, Crockett promoted a Flair/Garvin match where if Flair won he’d win the services of Precious, and we got a really, really off the wall Ric Flair promo involving a mannequin and Flair “practicing” for his dream date with Precious. This is one of the inciting incidents behind letters asking about whether Crockett is appropriate for children and if this is hurting their ability to expand their audience. Anyway, we have another letter in this issue (by one of the editors of Pro Wrestling Digest) touching on the Flair/Precious skit and bringing up that it really helps WWF/Hogan because what parent is going to want to watch two self-professed sex fiends fight over a woman when they can see Hogan and the All-American image he presents. Dave responds by noting that properly promoted wrestling can hit a lot of demographics, and it’s just bad business to completely alienate a demographic. It may be impossible to please everyone, but that’s no excuse. When wrestling gets hot, it’s the kids and teenage audience that grows most because they’re most easily swayed into getting on board with what’s hot. So Dave doesn’t think wrestling should be G rated and Mickey Mouse, but it’s also a clear mistake to go R rated and do stuff that’ll make parents turn off the tv or not bring their kids because of poor taste. Also, next issue of Pro Wrestling Digest is going to have a big article on AIDS and wrestling that will stir controversy. I’ll see about tracking it down and adding it as a supplement to a future issue. Watch: Flair practices for Precious and Flair’s dream date with “Precious” Another letter asks what Dusty must have been thinking when booking WarGames 2. Paul Ellering is a manager. Why not have him submit to Flair? Then again, having the manager submit to the world champion heel must be unconscionable to Dusty. Sure, Big Bubba Rogers was under a mask as War Machine, but everyone knew it was him. So what must Steve Williams be wondering about what being UWF Champion really means? Also, the Crockett shows in Stockton are good because Eddie Gilbert’s booking those. Ted DiBiase won’t be returning to Japan for at least two years, so All Japan has officially vacated the PWF World Tag Titles. Hansen and Dick Slater will go against Jumbo Tsuruta and Tiger Mask II to decide the new champions. Also in All Japan, they did a neat feud thing on August 21 involving Great Kabuki, Genichiro Tenryu, and Toshiaki Kawada. Kabuki and Tsuruta teamed against Ashura Hara and Tenryu, with Kabuki misting Tenryu before the match even started. So then he and Tsuruta beat up their opponents until Kawada (who’s just a prelim guy) comes out to help Tenryu. Samson Fuyuki runs out to even things up and they made a six-man match out of it, and Tsuruta pinned Kawada. Then Tenryu got mad at Kawada for losing the match and kicked him off the team and told him to go back to Tsuruta’s dressing room. When Kawada arrived, Tsuruta and Kabuki wouldn’t let him in, so now Kawada has no friends and is on his own. New Japan’s tv will move from Tursday nights to Monday nights in just a few weeks. Choshu is still banned from wrestling on tv and there’s no end to that situation in sight. JWP continues to fall apart. Jackie Sato has now quit, joining Shinobu Kandori, Xochitl Hamada, Estelle Molina, Gran Hamada (trainer and promoter), and Nancy Kimi as major recent departures. They’re certainly experiencing financial problems, and they never got a tv deal, so they were pretty doomed from the get-go. They’re pushing Rumi Kazama as the major star and the new front office has signed a deal for Rumi Kazama comics in Japan. She’s a very small girl who got some fame from martial arts movies and delivers kicks like Sayama does. The Road Warriors and Michael Hayes have both signed long-term contracts with JCP. The Road Warriors should now get a big push and used better and more regularly in the process. Terry Gordy has not signed, because he doesn’t want to give up his Japan commitments. Thanksgiving should be interesting, because in addition to Crockett doing Starrcade it’s looking like WWF also has some big plans. Dave’s speculating, but he wouldn’t be surprised to see an Andre-Hogan rematch booked to take eyes from Starrcade. Crockett has three venues booked for Thanksgiving: the Pavilion in Chicago, Greensboro, and the Superdome. This right here and the bit earlier about Crockett getting ppv for Starrcade is the beginning of one of the most significant stories of the year and the birth of Survivor Series. NEXT ISSUE: Scott "Hog" Irwin passes away, Survivor Series announced, Championship Wrestling from Florida on death's door, The Macho King is crowned.
This movie portray yigal amir as a kind of israeli james bond meet assassin meshiah. it has nothing to do with reality. this movie is pure science fiction.
this kind of movie can not be made in the state of israel without government approval. this shows what kind of government is in control. We've picked up a lot of new people so I wanted to make this post to inform people on the truly insidious nature of Communism and its history. This information is pretty much not taught at schools and universities period. Every single university nowadays teaches Critical Theory so it would be counter productive for them to actually teach the truth. A Brief History of Communism 1850 Germany: The Proletariat is borderline exploited. Old capitalism treated them like refuse, causing them to be mentally & physically destroyed to such an extent that when the German military was looking for new, healthy people they had big problems finding them. Marx seeing this as an opportunity writes the 'Manifesto of the Communist Party’ in which he declares the following goals (that no one seems to know): By causing a violent proletarian revolution which will kill all the capitalists he wants the: 1) Nationalisation of all means of production aka, abolishment of all competition 2) Creation of fictional property that belongs to everybody aka, the takeover of said property by those who led the revolution 3) Creation of a 'system of terror' which will make sure the communist leaders will stay in positions of power as soon as the system goes bankrupt and the people will rebel. Sidenote: so actually pretty much the same situation we have in the EU right now. The system is bankrupt and a rebellion (in form of the rise of the right) is coming. The difference is that the modern EU does not (yet) has a 'system of terror' which it could use to suppress said rebellion. The fact that for Marxism to be put in place a violent revolution was mandatory was the main difference between Marxist socialism and other socialist ideas which wanted to achieve their goals via peaceful reforms. The problem both versions have to face eventually is that socialism as a whole is a system that has to fail sooner or later. The difference is that when this happens the socialists trying to get to power via peaceful reforms will inevitably lose it compared to those who got there with violence and can simply use their 'system of terror' to keep their power any time. After three major attempts classical Marxism failed in the west for two reasons: Because of the technical revolution & the changes in the proletariats mentality which for the first time in history allowed them to escape from poverty and moral degeneracy just with hard work and discipline. What do I mean by that? The changes in their mentality were caused by the introduction of different help & educational programs which were funded by the state of Germany and the church in the 1860s. Those originally very primitive, pessimistic and frustrated people started to study and have basic moral values again which increased their outlook on their future. At the same time the technical revolution increased the demand for highly qualified workers. This was the main reason why big companies had to start to compete with each other over them. That’s what caused capitalism to slowly change since these companies had for the first time an interest in the education and wellbeing of their workers. This eventually resulted in the so called Fordism of 1910 where Ford was able to pay his workers so much that they could buy the cars they were building at the time with just saving 3 months of salaries. But in return Ford demanded a perfectly educated and behaved worker who never made any mistakes while at work or at home. This strict work-ethic caused his factories to skyrocket in production efficiency and sales. Prime example of good capitalism. The rise of the proletariat was an issue for Marx because he knew in order to start a bloody revolution he needed a frustrated, pessimistic, uneducated group of degenerated people who have as little moral values as possible and will (if necessary) kill if he wants them to. Back in the day the proletariat met these conditions perfectly because those were people who (originally) didn't know how to work and even if they did they had a deep rooted hatred towards it because their last several generations got exploited through their hard & honest work by their (old) capitalistic employers. The increasing well-being of the proletarian masses caused a major drop in the communist party’s popularity in 1875 which forced many Marxists to give the idea of a revolution up and try to achieve their goals via peaceful reforms. That's how the first (pre-runner of today’s Social-Dems) social democracy was created. When Marx found out about this he was furious, because for him the violent revolution was an indispensable, holy part of the party. But whatever Marx did, his idea of a violent revolution was still losing popularity. What did this mean for Marx and his followers? It meant that they were losing their army of 'degenerate' proletarians which was designed to kill all the capitalists and help the Marxists to take over the positions of power as it is clearly described in the Communist Manifesto. At the same time more and more people started to prove all the pseudo-economic statements Marx made in his manifesto wrong. Even though he tried to correct them he was hitting a new low. The classical Marxists needed help and help they got. Lenin wrote a book in 1902 for the German SPD Party in which he changed one major thing compared to classical Marxism. He summed up that 'one can't count on the proletariat because they have been corrupted by capitalism' and that 'they are too primitive to understand real communist values and real freedom. ' As always the progress has to be made by the elite and the revolution has to be carried out by an elite party of professional revolutionists (see similarities today: Leftist groups such as Black Lives Matter/Antifa funded by Soros) against the will of the people if necessary which later are going to be kept down by the use of propaganda and/or terror. Even though Lenin saw this revolution happening in Germany, the war and other factors ended up making this plan possible for the first time in Russia. Sidenote: Lenin and his little crew of professionals got a lot of money from Germany and America to make sure the revolution was successful. Why? Because in the early days of the 20th century Russia was becoming an increasingly powerful economic danger to these two nations and they saw the revolution as a way to stop Russia’s growth. It worked and Lenin paid them 130x (!!! ) the amount of money he owed them back as soon as he was in power. So if you think the revolution was a movement of the people, think again. Lenin realised in Russia every single goal described in Marx’s manifesto and used his 'system of terror' to allow the communists to reign over the country for the next 60 years. One example is the persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union which started as early as 1917 and ended up killing 12-20 million Christians in total. And yet somehow we only talk today about 6 million Jews? Why is this important? Because propaganda caused people to believe that Marx & Engels were good-spirited idealists that were simply misunderstood by Stalin and it ended up badly. Nope. The communist ideology talks from its earliest days in the communist manifesto about killing people to take over their positions of power and killing more people to keep it. After the revolution was successful in Russia there were 3 major attempts to make it happen in Germany/Europe. One in 1918 where the (99% Jewish) communist party wanted to use the frustrated and weakened German proletariat to overthrow the German government with violence. They failed, yet this may give some context why Hitler who knew about this and watched what the (mostly Jewish) communist party in Russia was doing to Christians (12-20mil dead), wanted to get rid of all Jews in Germany. The last attempt failed in 1923. That's when Marxists understood that they have to find another way. So remember: even though Russia was the first country to realise Marx’s wet dream, Marxism is an ideology which was created in the west, evolved in the west and in the end won in the west. But how? As it became clear that the people of the west rejected the classical idea of a bloody revolution, Marxists in the west had to find another way to use them to gain power. To find answers, they founded in 1924 the first Marxist university in Frankfurt (these people eventually ended up in America because of Hitler) where they focused on 2 main questions: 1) Why did Marxism fail in the west? 2) What could be improved/changed to succeed in the west? Compared to today where every single meaningful university or institute is Marxist, one can see how much has changed in the last 90 years. In 1931 a group of new communists came to said university in Frankfurt who made significant changes to the theory of Marxism which was the beginning of the so called 'neo-Marxism'. The most important people there were Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse, Erich Fromm and Theodor Adorno. Sidenote: Many years later Adorno added his interpretation of neo-Marxism as a theory to the foundation work which has been done in the 30s and 40s. For some reason until this very day, every university wastes the people’s time trying to understand neo Marxism by looking at what Adorno meant in his complicated thesis instead looking at the very clearly formulated foundation work. To make it clear: Neo-Marxism completely changed its foundation by removing all the economic-talk classical Marxism was based on because 1) almost everything Marx wrote himself about economy turned out to be wrong 2) they had nothing economic to offer for the proletariat since they started to escape poverty themselves thanks to capitalism. They needed to find another way to 'liberate' people because liberation from poverty wasn't needed anymore. This is the basic Marxist thinking: They are going to liberate everyone. Doesn't matter if they want it or not. So who can they liberate and how? Finally they found the answer as Erich Fromm introduced the neo-Marxists to a sex maniac’s theory about a 'sexual revolution'. The maniacs name was Wilhelm Reich who used to be Sigmund Freud’s student until Freud threw him out for being too radical. Reich’s thesis was that the very purpose of a human being is complete sexual liberation. He claimed that the church and traditions are the main reasons why people can't liberate themselves sexually, which eventually ends up turning them into fascists. Reich’s idea was that first communists are going to overthrow capitalism so that later the liberated people will have all the time necessary to focus only on their sexuality. (Seems familiar in today’s society? Liberals who never experienced hard work, yet are obsessed about their sexuality? ) But Erich Fromm and his neo-Marxist friends immediately saw this revolutions immense potential if one would simply reverse its steps and first liberate the people’s sexualities and as a result overthrow capitalism from within. And they were right. They carried this plan out in the sexual revolution of the 60s which resulted in the society we live in today. So what can we learn from that? That the neo-Marxists understood that capitalism can get overthrown without a violent revolution if they can destroy the work-ethic/respect of work people have within by occupying them with their sexualities. Achieving this wasn't easy; they had to de-educate people from what they've used to believe. So their main goals were: 1) Destroy families. We all know what feminism and Hollywood did (and continues to do) to destroy white, heterosexual families with faith in god. (Mind you that 99% of the feminist movement founders were communist, Jewish women) 2) Pull a kid out of its parents influence at the youngest age possible (movies & pop culture) in order to have influence on it at the crucial time when it develops it's personality and teach it to rebel against his/her parents (or any type of authority) as much as possible. And later on, teach the kid that any constraint at all equals almost slavery and is inhumane. Government constraints? Slavery. Sexual constraints? Slavery. Work related constraints? Slavery. Big Media today: 'You gotta be young, wild & free and have as many (sexual) experiences as possible' Remember? Anyone having any sort of self-control, discipline or moral values is by definition a slave and 'regressive' instead of progressive. 3) The next obvious target therefore was the church and its influence. One needs to understand that back then the church was the only well-organised institution that had a pretty big say in the average person’s life. Either a society has a general direction/ideology according to which the people live or it doesn't. The neo-Marxists aim was to destroy any sort of guidance people got from the church until it is widely labelled as a gay-hating, paedophile infested marginal institution only blind fanatics’ care about. They succeeded. Why was that so important? Because when using all these tactics you create generations of lost people without any work-ethic which then won't be able to create the prosperity they crave by themselves any longer. They depend on the neo-Marxists now and will vote for them whatever may come. In other words, the genius move the Marxist here did was that they promised people all kinds of rights and freedoms but at the same time depriving them of ways to earn different goods to utilise said rights. What is a right to travel good for if you can’t rent a car or pay for a bus ticket? See, a right you can't utilise is pure fiction. So what does one do when he has all kinds of rights and freedoms (and just to be clear; for the last 60 years everyone has been promising freedom to everybody) but no way to earn goods to be able to utilise them? He has to steal these goods. And thus will vote for any party/system that is ready to steal them for him. He will vote for any party that promises 'free stuff'. (Democrats in America, Social Democrats in Europe). And exactly this is what Marxists have been promising to people for the last 100 years. Freedom without the necessity of work. Just vote for us and you'll get it for free. A prime example for that mechanism that comes to my mind is how liberals in Austria created the right for everyone to go to universities while depriving them of ways to earn money, making sure that people couldn't afford to pay for the tuition fees. What is such a right good for if you can't pay for it? Soon enough people demanded that the tuition fees had to be dropped but the ruling conservative party (VP) at the time said that the state can't afford this. That's exactly what the Social Democrats (SP) have been waiting for. As soon as the word was out, they promised to abolish any type of tuition fees as long as you vote for them. What they didn't mention is that they had to generate incredible amounts of debt to do so. Literally anyone could have done that. But nobody cared; people got out and voted making them into the strongest party at the time. A side product they also achieved was that that every student and university became liberal. But as one might have foreseen, this type of 'free stuff' government can't continue forever: The utopian world leftist politicians have been keeping alive since the 60s by constant generation of new debt is coming to an end. Let's be honest here. The west has enjoyed prosperity which the world has never seen before simply as a result of exploitation of 3rd world countries. Almost all heavy industry from the west left to Asia, while promising us that we are something special and that machines / automation or some cheap workers imported from Mexico/middle east are going to do the dirty work for us. But fact is this system never was and never will be sustainable. We just got comfortable on the massive influx of goods from these countries and can't comprehend a reality without them. Since 1969 this utopian world is being artificially kept alive by constant generation of debt in almost all European countries. Thus every party pretending it will keep these goods coming (doesn’t matter from where) will win any election because of deniers who can't handle the fact that their safe-space bubble might burst soon. Already in 1971 Germany had 3 million 'guest workers' from the middle east taking the hardest/dirtiest jobs from their hosts for half the price a German would do it, while the Germans students were out in the street demonstrating for sexual liberation. (Remember? Neo Marxists dream: no work, obsessed with sexuality) This 'counter-cultural' revolution of the 60s and 70s was the last nail in the coffin the Social Democrats needed to gain total control over Europe and to keep that safe space bubble alive until this very day. So why did Europe happily embrace these neo-Marxist ideas instead of stopping them? Because the Social Democrats which were granted power over the EU parliament in the 60s were filled with neo Marxists who were very happy with the progress they were making. As soon as they got into power they turned their focus on the next goal: the replacement of the original founding block of the European Union 'the Schuman Declaration' by the Ventotene Manifesto written by Italian communist Altiero Spinelli. They managed to do this in 1984 as one of their biggest accomplishments, yet we know so little about it even today. It might sound surreal but as a result the Europe we know today is based on communist ideas and values. The content of the Ventotene Manifesto is easy to look up but I'll break down the most important points: 1) All European countries have to give up on their sovereignty and currency (no borders, only Euro) 2) Nationalisation of all independent means of production 3) All European countries have to relinquish their own armies which will then be replaced by one collective 'EU Army' to enforce everything the EU-Central has decided in case a country will not cooperate. (Note that a nation state without armed forces is unable to enforce its sovereignty) Preferably, said EU army is comprised mostly of members of some other culture (cough Islam cough) who won't have any mental resistance shooting Europeans if they might oppose the EUs decisions. Still wondering why Merkel is so happy about immigration from foreign cultures? Does all that sound familiar? Because it is. Especially 3) is a necessary step in creating the 'System of Terror' Marx was talking about in the communist manifesto back in 1850. There is more: 1) has already been tried in 2004 but France and Holland had a referendum where the people decided 'no'. Even though Merkel and the EU have been trying hard to achieve their final goals 1), 2) and 3) they weren't able to which caused them to become increasingly desperate because they don't know for how much longer they will be able to sustain this illusion we live in. We have that exact scenario Marx predicted, that the socialist system is going bankrupt now (Spain, Italy, France, Greece etc. ) and an increasing rebellion (rise of the right/populism) which can't be stopped. There are 2 possible endings to this story: 1) Merkel/Marxists will finalise steps 1, 2 and 3 in time and will gain a 'system of terror' which they will use to suppress any rebellion for years to come. 2) Merkel/Marxists won't finish in time and the rebellion of the right will overthrow them. Let's be honest: If the current system in Europe is to be kept alive for much longer a complete collapse is inevitable because most countries are already at their maximal capacity when it comes to spending money and creating debt. And to top it all off there is nothing to counteract that, since Europe isn't able to produce any goods itself. One more financial crisis and everything crash. This is why you can literally observe the increasing tension within the EU. Merkel is desperate. She knows an era is coming to an end so she is looking for a way out and the only thing the left has left is to promote degeneracy and hope when they go for a final push of 1, 2 and 3 there won't be much resistance left. They also know that one such resistance people have is their identity. People won't be happy about giving up their country’s sovereignty or borders as long as they can tell themselves apart from people from other countries. The solution is simple isn't it? Miscegenation (race mixing). That desperation is the reason why nowadays you will see transgenderism and other degenerate filth on television every single day, homosexual courses in kindergartens and constant talk about fake news in Europe. They are afraid and this is their only hope. Merkel now introduced a law against 'fake news'. But who decides what is fake and what isn't? We can already see Facebook / Twitter / Google censoring conservative opinions and anything contrary to the mainstream narrative is brushed under the rug. Attempts at legislating ‘fake news’ is simply a step towards totalitarian government and by censoring dissent, it becomes much more difficult to challenge bad ideas. In the marketplace provided by freedom of speech, bad ideas are always met by good ideas and the free market usually decides with the good idea. A case in point is how almost all unmoderated or lightly moderated forums on the internet lean conservative while those with heavy moderation are left-leaning. Whilst the laws against fake news are relatively new, legislation against 'hate speech' has existed for decades in most Western countries. Hate speech is one of the most sinister concepts developed and appropriated into our culture. Hate has been stigmatised in our culture for decades to the point where merely pointing out statistics on crime etc. is a major cause for contention and is enough for them to get 'triggered'. Being filled with hate is indeed a bad quality to have as it can cloud one's judgment. Today, hate has replaced real evil as the thing to demonize and resist. It sounds like a good thing at first, until you realise what doing so has enabled. By demonising hate as much as our culture does, it makes it far easier to demonise the things someone doesn't like by claiming words and actions from the opposition as hate. And it's even easier if one is rooted in the emotional whirlpool that many are stuck within where their feelings rule their world view. When your values are completely based on the feelings over reality, it's nearly automatic that anyone or anything that opposes one's feelings based values would be seen as hateful, which again is their biggest evil. The practitioners of the new political correctness are not equipped for a world in which individuals can disagree with what is deemed appropriate thought. They rely on silencing the opposition with hysterics, instead of winning with superior ideas. It gets even worse though. Because hate has been so stigmatised, where anything labelled as hate justifies any form of treatment or resistance to it. Deplorable actions are justified because it's the greatest evil, so do anything against the greatest evil even if it's something you've professed to be against. Slapping on the label of hate strips something or someone of all their normal social and civil protections and declares open season on the hate label recipient, which is why it's ok to punch a racist because they're spouting hate speech. It's ok to accost Trump supporters because Trump is hateful. Hate speech isn't real speech and therefore not protected. Most free countries’ freedom of speech contain a short list of what isn't protected: fighting words; (inciting someone to violence); obscenity (very high standard, like child porn); libel/slander; criminal activity (extortion, fraud, etc. ); threats of violence (must be credible); copyrighted material. Hate speech was something the Soviets would use to control the narrative in the USSR. Especially when it came to holding it together and being able to do whatever they wanted to do while being able to put down complaint. Ironically McCarthyism was a Soviet thing as well. However for them it was used to accuse people of being a Nazi. Eastern Europe bore the brunt of the Nazis far worse than the allies on the western side did. Even the invention of the term racism was a Soviet trope. Essentially if you were one of the countries the Soviets took from rather than liberates from the Nazis if you wanted independence from the USSR or objected to things such as force migrations then you would be called a nationalist racist Nazi making hate speech. It's ironic that today what's happening in the west is more like what happened in the USSR and Russia is an ally against that. In addition, most countries in Western Europe are attempting to pass legislation cracking down on the internet and encryption. They claim it is to prevent terror attacks but exactly how many attacks has the vast US spying apparatus prevented? Exactly zero. The real aim of the creation of backdoors into encryption and software is for unrestricted mass surveillance of the populace to identify and unmask dissidents and anyone who might cause trouble for the government. It is plain to see how much of a danger this has the potential to be in the hands of a totalitarian government. Even if the government of the time is somewhat benevolent, there is no guarantee of succeeding governments to wield the vast spying apparatus with restraint. The supreme irony of Communism, which no supporter of Communism gets, is that the intellectuals and activists who agitated for Marxism in the first place are usually the first to be lined up against the wall to be shot. They imagine they'll be elevated to philosopher kings, when in fact they'll just end up in an unmarked grave. Dictators have no use for potential nonconformists, even the ones who gave them power. The issue is that government fills a power vacuum. It's why anarchy would never work, and why Libertarianism is also flawed. Remove or weaken government, and a different type of power will just move in - be it criminal, religious, or military. Someone will always try to exercise their power over you, and I'd rather it be my elected representative than someone with a gun and a bad attitude. With Communism, because it’s always brought about by opportunists and thugs (as the working classes never actually vote for it), the government becomes ruled that way, and becomes just another criminal enterprise. Now they have power, the first thing they want to do is make sure nobody removes them like they did the last lot, so they round up all the agitators and have them shot. Including ones on their 'side', as their ideals and organisation skills could easily turn against them one day. Marxism is like a spiritual infection, there's just nothing good about it even if you're one of the useful idiots who believe in it. Marx viewed traditions and civilization as the 'infection' of humanity. His ideas could be considered chemo-therapy, if they wipe out traditions, cool. If they kill the civilization, meh, it was going to die of traditions anyway. Most people attack Communism like it is just a set of opposing social/economic beliefs, it's not. There is nothing creative about Marxism. It was designed by Marx to be destructive. Its’ purpose is to destroy. It wasn't promulgated to create society but to tear it down. That's why there isn't a single functioning communist society on this earth. Seizing the means of production includes labour aka the individual person is required to do whatever job the state deems the person is fit for. Failure to comply will result in the person being deported to gulag or shot. This fact of Communist states is often neglected to be stated. These Antifa / Black Lives Matter fantasists are no different than the useful idiots from the West who flock to Syria to join ISIS, and just end up as cannon fodder on the front lines while the actual leaders are busy hiding billions of stolen oil money in personal Swiss bank accounts. Fascism almost exclusively goes with socialism. It's a system it was designed for. Group collectivity, that sort of thing. However, socialism was never designed to be used permanently. It was meant to be a transitionary state between capitalism and communism. To add some perspective, imagine that some communists were to take over the US government today and get directly into communism. You'd notice, wouldn't you? This is why communists follow a pattern: 1) Find a nation that hates its government to a very high degree, be it due to a war (Russia, 1917) or an economic depression (Germany, Italy, Spain, and other European powers during the 1930s). 2) Tell the people about a supposedly wonderful new system that makes sure everyone is paid enough and that all are equal in every aspect (socialism). Note that this doesn't need to be true, nor will it be true. In truth, all will live in poverty as you soak up their money, but during a slow transition wherein they forget. Speaking of which- 3) Make them forget. Heavy use of propaganda, and even purges of dissidents. 4) Slowly replace the old ways by enlarging it, until it becomes communism. At this point, few will remember the old ways, and all must have great fear of the government. That is how communism begins. It is worth noting that, yes; communism works better than socialism because at least communism was intended to work. However, that's like comparing a paper umbrella to a cardboard one, as neither will work permanently, only longer. Eventually, communism fails in the same way a lobster dies. For those who don't know, lobsters are biologically immortal; they do not age and never stop growing. However, lobsters eventually die when they become so large that the strain of moulting their old shell is too much and kills them with the strain. Communism is the same as the lobster. It never stops growing, and essentially can't stop growing, until the moment that the strain of controlling the economy becomes so great that the state cannot handle it and it collapses. How long does this take? 80 year at the max. The Soviet Union lasted the longest, and was also the first implementation of communism. Even the lobster lives longer than communism, some living for over a hundred years before finally dying. The oldest one found was alive during the American Civil War, for context. Communism has no place in the world. It is a system based on both fear and reverence. In it, the state chooses who is taken from and who is given to, who gets to think what, who lives and who dies. Communism is an attempt to play God. An attempt to place in the hands of foolish and short-sighted mortal beings a power that could only work in the hands of an omnipresent, all-knowing being. It is an attempt that makes men rewrite the codes of morality to fit their needs rather than what is truly right, making the law into sin and virtue, the only sin being to go against the state of stand in its way. That is why communism fails, because no man can ever handle even a fraction of the power of God, simply because they lack the knowledge and reasoning of God. They don't even have the knowledge and reasoning of most other mortals, for it they did, they wouldn't attempt to institute that system at all. If Marx did, he never would have written the Communist Manifesto, and would have dismissed it as a bad idea doomed to fail, as all people of normal or higher intelligence should be able to do. No society ever thrived because it had a large and growing class of parasites living off those who produce. I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money - Thomas Sowell.
James reid terrible days. Good narrator. So many things in art, I find, I didn't truly understand until after awakening. So often they are modeled after the experience of awakening, or aim to teach it's lessons, that the uninitiated(so to speak) will be left grasping for what it's meant to signify. Most recently I've realized this of one of my favorite films, " The Truman Show. " Many people on this sub lament about awakening, saying it has given them the feeling of being totally alone in a world where nothing has meaning. For those individuals, read on, for I have an important message for you. For those of you who haven't seen it, " The Truman Show, " is a movie about a dystopian reality where a massive media corporation bought a child still in the womb, and created a fictional world in a city sized set where all the events of his life(more or less) are dictated from above. The story centers around Truman's gradual awakening to the illusory nature of his existence, and his consequent liberation. If you haven't seen it already, I would highly recommend you give it a watch and come back to read this later for two reasons. 1. ) So I don't have to give an extensive plot summary and 2. ) So you can watch it with your perspective untainted by my jibber-jabber. Having said this, I would like to make some comments/share some incites: "The Truman Show, " presents what I would consider a gnostic world view. A little background on this for those of us unfamiliar. Gnosticism is an early christian subsect that holds the view we are living in a, "prison world, " ruled over by a, "mad God. " They view the exterior condition as fundamentally bad, and see the concept that other Christians would call original sin as proof of some divine crime man has commited, for which we've been imprisoned in the material world(I can't blame them for this; taken literally this is very much what the scripture seems to imply). The ultimate goal or rapture in gnostic literature is a grand prison break in which mankind breaks out of this mortal coil. Gnosticism presents some interesting problems to the aware, in that(like other western religions) it depicts a reality in which there is a fundamental seperation between God and man, and claims there's a higher realm more real or genuine than the one we inhabit. This seems to run counter to enlightenment wisdom, but only when taken literally. Much like the other western religions, when viewed metaphorically, we can divine some useful insights from this bleak outlook. If you view all of being as one continuation, and you know that any perceived reality is just as illusory as it is real, you know that Truman's situation isn't really that of an imprisoned being in the cursed world of a maleficent overlord, who breaks out into another world somehow more genuine. Instead, it's the story of a man who's simply submitted to the currents of fate, dictated by an individual just as human as he, breaking out into a world equally material to the one which he's been living in. Truman's escape isn't into a higher plane, it's an escape into a life of spontaneity and self governance from a prison of acceptance and submission. This is my message to all who've been brought down by seeing through the vale: The world you live in isn't any more fake than it is real. It's not one or the other. It's how you choose to perceive it. The world may seem dismal, but it's no more a result of the conditions you find yourself in than the views you chose to hold of it. This is the power of enlightenment, the ability to chose how you view the world and act accordingly. You can own your own character, your own story, and enjoy them despite knowing what they are. You can break free, just like Truman did.
I've loved noah baumbach's films. They're all so real, comparable,and dialogue driven. I cant wait to see this next one. What mean inciting incident. I for one DO justify violence against Leftists! BringBackMcCarthyism. Terrible day in history. I love her strenght. I hope she runs for office. Terrible day at work. Terrible days of jadine.
- Writer Edward Seaman
- Biography: Assistant editor, columnist and occasional podcast host (among other things). #NCFC
0 comentarios